This does not look good. It is the 16th and this is the first post I have made this month. At least I have line of site to 3 posts (including this one), but I better start seeing some weird things soon or my quota will again be in jeopardy – I know, broken record but it is August and I am on goal and within tolerance of my New Year’s resolution – before you comment, how well are you doing on your resolutions to this point? 8^). In this post, there is good news and bad news. The good news first, my wife finally took the time to actually read my blog which requires me to use my second hand to count the number of readers so far. So my readership is increasing, but this one came at a small price. Having been with me to experience a number of the blog topics, she was in a position to correct some errors in my post. I always want to be as accurate as possible, so I am taking the time to correct a few of the mistakes she found and follow up on another post.
Starting off, I would like to apologize to Applebee’s for incorrectly identifying their fine establishment as the one causing us hardships with the gift card. You can read the post here if you are curious. Linda reminded it was not at Applebees, but rather:

That’s right, the episode with the gift card happened at Ched’duh’s in Springfield. Please go out of your way enjoy Applebee’s fine cuisine and make your own choice about going to the other.
Secondly, the location of the Moose encounter was not at Yellowstone National Park as indicated in my blog entry. The moose was actually seen as we were exiting the Rocky Mountain National Park. I sure hope he does not find out and decide to pay me a visit.
I also thought I would take the time to follow up on the post regarding Sunny D. You know, the one where they purposely labeled their container to deceive the consumer. Anyway, as mentioned in the post I did take the time to comment on their website and thought I would simply provide the details of their response:
This was my submission to their corporate website:
Content: I want to comment on what I consider intentional and truly deceptive marketing practices by your company. I was recently at Sams and decided to go with your orange juice offering over your competitors based on your label indicating 100% Vitamin C. Unfortunately, I purchased a case of your product under false pretenses. Once home I eventually checked the nutrition facts and noticed that a single bottle of your product only provides 80 percent of the DV. Sure enough when I turned the bottle over I found the small print of per 8 oz serving. Now I ask you, does a company with integrity put this deceptive label on a 6.75 floz container?… or maybe you think the consumer would be more than willing to op en another bottle and try to guesstimate 1.25 floz to conform to the label. I’ll accept the fact I failed due diligence on the purchase, but as a result of being deceived I will be hard pressed to consider any of your products in the future. I hope the loss of company integrity was worth not increasing your unit size or changing your label appropriately.
This was the ONLY response I received from taking the time to comment on their website regarding what I think is a serious example of deception:
Subject: RE: [BULK] Message from Sunny D
Good Morning,
Thank you for contacting SunnyD and sharing your thoughts with us. I will certainly share your feedback with the rest of the team. Thank you again for writing. Have a wonderful day!
Sincerely,
Sunny Delight Beverages Co
Consumer Relations Department
Contact Center hours are M-F 8am-7pm
Wow, I am truly a satisfied customer and looking forward to my wonderful day. I especially liked the [BULK] portion of their subject line so I am fully aware that the entry was never seen by anyone and the automated response had a built in delete submission line in the CGI. My lifelong ban list would like to welcome Sunny D to their pages.
I will contrast this to a recent corporate dialog with a company called RoadID. I always wear their product whenever I run to give both myself and my wife a bit of comfort knowing there is a possibility I could be saved after keeling over on a long hot run. Unfortunately, the strap came apart on it so I looked up their customer support email address from their company website and literally emailed their company president (yes, that is the address they gave out) and sent them short email telling them how much I liked their product and if there was a way I could purchase a replacement strap. Almost immediately, a support representative contacted me and told me how to purchase another one, but they were going to send me one right away and waive the fee. Hats off to Christy for going way above and beyond to satisfy a customer. I’ll recommend RoadID to anyone who wants some security while away from home.
That’s all I have for now, time to start planning the remaining minimum 5 posts for this month

To complete this month’s quota, I figured I would mention I recently earned another medal for my running collection. I basically train year round for one key race a year and that race is the Bix7 held in Davenport Iowa. For those who have never experienced it, the event is 7 miles (actually 2 miles if you choose to do the QuickBix) in some difficult hills. The first 7/10ths of the mile is basically straight up followed by ~2 miles down and then the smaller but definitely harder hill short of the turnaround and then reversed. This year I finally lined up at the start without much injury for a change and that coupled with favorable start temperature led to a P.R. for me. Usually the temperature and humidity are through the roof due to the late July start, but thanks to Global Warming (smirk) we starting the morning at 57 degrees (yes, I was shivering when I got out of the car) and warmed up to around 87 by mid race. I’ve ran it in the past over 90 with 23 people going to the hospital that year.







It is very apparent that I spend waay too much time at Target or there is just waay to much stuff to be observed there. I think this is like my third post based on things that I have seen there and thought was interesting. This particular incident occurred at the checkout lane a few days ago. While we were completing our purchase there, something on the electronic register display caught my eye. On the lower left hand of the LCD panel there was a section labeled as Last 10 Ratings (or something very close to that heading, I forgot to write down the actual words). Underneath that label was a series of 10 letters which I am guessing where the results of the last 10 assessments. In this particular situation there were only the letters G and R. There were definitely more R’s than G’s, but there was absolutely no legend for what they actually meant. If it was important enough to have it visible to the customer, you would think there would be some explanation for the values provided. I decided not to question the clerk on the chance the ratings she was getting were not flattering. The trip home was spent pondering the potential rating options:












